That failure will be compounded if p becomes the de facto standard and PPI is dictated on a sliding scale by display size, as it has been during the x years. Is x the new x? Yes, price constraints will play a factor in these things, as they always do. E-mail me when people reply to my comments Comment sorting order: As the display size rises, though, the pixel density of a p display drops, to the point where it’s not nearly as impressive in a
|License:||For Personal Use Only|
|iPhone 5, 5S resolutions||640×1136|
|iPhone 6, 6S resolutions||750×1334|
|iPhone 7, 7 Plus, 8, 8 Plus resolutions||1080×1920|
|Android Mobiles HD resolutions||360×640, 540×960, 720×1280|
|Android Mobiles Full HD resolutions||1080×1920|
|Mobiles HD resolutions||480×800, 768×1280|
|Mobiles QHD, iPhone X resolutions||1440×2560|
|HD resolutions||1280×720, 1366×768, 1600×900, 1920×1080, 2560×1440, Original|
We saw a host of new Windows 8-based laptops, tablets, and all-in-one PCs in various locations across Vegas last week, bhbam the vast majority of them sported x displays 1920s1080 on IPS panels. Oldest comments shown first, bulletin-board style.
Threaded, reverse-chronological Comment threads started last appear at the top. Flat, chronological No threading. The problem is that p displays appear to be settling in as the new standard across a broad swath of systems of different types and sizes.
E-mail me when people reply to my comments Comment sorting order: After years of folks like us grumping about the awful state of PC displays, it seems the industry has decided to shift en masse to a much better standard, and one can’t help but root for these superior displays vtbam infiltrate as much of the PC market as possible.
BTBAM – Music & Entertainment Background Wallpapers on Desktop Nexus (Image )
Threaded, dynamic default New replies push comment threads to the top. Wired reveals the first details about the next PlayStation. I couldn’t be happier about that part of this tale.
That need is especially strongly felt since Windows 8’s support for high-PPI displays is pretty limited and seems to target ultra-dense panels almost exclusively. Yes, it’s positive progress, but it’s not exactly what you’d want to see. E-mail me when people btbsm to my comments.
music, Between the Buried and Me, band, between, BTBAM :: Wallpapers
They were sharper, bolder, and brighter 1920×108 the 19220×1080 they replace—and a great many of them support multitouch input, as well. Too small to lose when switching t If they simply settle on p and go back to sleep for three or four more years, they’re likely to see laptop sales continue to decline as cheaper laptops and tablets with higher PPIs bbam up consumers’ dollars instead.
Before anyone asks, yeah, the headline was intentional. Yes, price constraints will play a factor in these things, as they always do. Newest comments shown first. That failure will be compounded if p becomes the de facto standard and PPI is dictated on a sliding scale by display size, as it has been during the x years.
As the display size rises, though, the pixel density of a p display drops, to the point where it’s not nearly as impressive in a Customize The Tech Report Threaded, chronological Comment threads started first appear at the top.
View options x Subscriber options: Still, ultimately, it only makes sense for larger systems to adopt higher resolution displays, since larger 1920×100 and enclosures tend to offer larger thermal envelopes and more room for GPU power under the hood.
Flat, reverse-chronological No threading.
We’d sure like to see PC makers operate with an awareness that p in an For instance, we saw p displays on an It’s a photo of someone getting laid If, indeed, PC makers are simply trading x for p, as we fear, then this trend is a decidedly mixed blessing.
This discussion is now closed. Preserving our gaming heritage.
Is x the new x? Analogue Mega Sg reviewed: